OAJ Blogs


Posted on: Feb 25, 2020

Some employers may require new employees to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements, which prevent claims from being handled in court. Arbitration agreements also reduce many of the legal rights afforded to employees by federal law. Instead, workplace incidents are handled internally. By requiring employees to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements, employers may be able to avoid lawsuits relating to workplace discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a policy statement in 1997 called Mandatory Binding Arbitration of Employment Discrimination Disputes as a Condition of Employment. The policy statement strongly opposed mandatory arbitration agreements in the workplace. It asserted that it "harms both the individual civil rights claimant and the public interest in eradicating discrimination. "

Does EEOC's policy statement conflicts with federal law?

The EEOC concluded that arbitration agreements avert the enforcement of federal laws against workplace discrimination. They also prevent the courts from properly interpreting the laws and protecting workers. On December 17, 2019, the EEOC nullified its policy statement due to conflict with current arbitration laws.

In 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that employment arbitration was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act — which was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge in 1925. The law allows businesses and organizations to privatize disputes involving discrimination.

The 2001 case — Circuit City Stores v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 — involved an employee who was hired as a sales counselor for Circuit City. Under the company's terms of employment, the employment application included a provision requiring that all disputes be settled internally by arbitration.

In 1997, the employee filed a workplace discrimination suit against Circuit City, citing California state employment law violations. Circuit City took matters to the Federal District Court. The Court found that the arbitration agreement between the employee and employer was outlined in the job application.

Do I still have legal options if I experienced workplace discrimination?

Despite rescinding its policy statement, the EEOC stated that they continue to be "fully available to employees as an avenue to assert EEO rights and to investigate in the public interest, regardless of whether the parties have entered into an enforceable arbitration agreement."

Even if an employee enters into an arbitration agreement with an employer, he or she still has the right to bring incidents of discrimination to the attention of the EEOC. Furthermore, an arbitration agreement will not prevent legal action taken by the EEOC on behalf of the employee.

Shared by Nilges Draher LLC
www.ohlaborlaw.com/blog

  • Friends of OAJ OAJ thanks the following companies for their support,

img
  • Barkan Meizlish LLP
  • Brian G. Miller Co., LPA
  • Bordas & Bordas, PLLC
  • Charles E. Boyk Law Offices
  • Christian R. Patno
  • Crandall & Pera Law
  • Eadie Hill Trial Lawyers
  • Elk & Elk
  • Garson Johnson, LLC
  • Geiser, Bowman & McLafferty, LLC
  • The Gervelis Law Firm
  • Grieco Law, LLC
  • Kisling Nestico & Redick
  • Kitrick, Lewis & Harris Co.,. LPA
  • Lamkin, Van Eman, Trimble & Dougherty, LLC
  • Leeseberg & Valentine
  • Leizerman & Associates, LLC
  • Meyer Wilson Co., LPA
  • Nager, Romaine, & Schneiberg
  • Nilges Draher LLC
  • Nurenberg Paris Injury Lawyers
  • O'Connor Acciani & Levy, LPA
  • Rittgers & Rittgers
  • Robert J. Wagoner, Co., LLC
  • Rourke & Blumenthal
  • Slater & Zurz, LLP
  • Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, LLP
  • Tittle & Perlmuter
  • Tzangas Plakas Mannos, Ltd.
  • Young & McCarthy